Upsetting Craigslist Post Of The Week

I really don’t think I need to go on and on about this one, it’s pretty obvious:
“I’m not into BDSM, just looking for a wealthy submissive male to provide a luxurious lifestyle, LTR or marriage. I like ambitious and successful and tall men (30-40ish). Respond with info and description and photo of yourself.

Be real and serious.”


Related posts:

  1. Suspended, Fucked and Kissed The spreader bar held my ankles, my wrists were attached...
  2. Perfect Storm We were on our first solo road-trip together, putting on...

9 Responses to Upsetting Craigslist Post Of The Week
  1. Marcelle Manhattan
    January 21, 2008 | 4:58 am

    I think the first line says it all: not into BDSM.

    ‘Cuz that ain’t BDSM; I’m pretty sure it’s gold-digging.

    Be real and serious.

  2. Wendy
    January 21, 2008 | 5:33 am

    You know, I don’t even mind gold digging, when its honest. “I will sleep with you, if you buy me things” thats a fair transaction.

    But throwing the kink aspect on it is dumb.

    Stupid bitch.

  3. Sophiste
    January 21, 2008 | 9:09 am

    I think she gets to ask for whatever she wants. I don’t see anything illegal about it, certainly. Of course nobody is obliged to give her what she wants simply because she’s asking for it! And it’s true that ads like that might cause unpleasantness in the social space, and I’ve no problem with your finding it upsetting. Still, I don’t find it illicit for her to ask.

    Also, since she’s saying she’s not into BDSM, maybe she’s using “submissive” as a ‘normal’ adjective, not a special role identity. She wants a deferential sort of man, and it makes sense that she would mention that, since money-inequality relationships sometimes can confer authority on the person with more money. And she specified that she’s “not into BDSM,” which might be a disambiguation for her use of “submissive.”

  4. Mz. Carmen
    January 21, 2008 | 5:20 pm

    I just wrote about placing ads and the outcome of some ads.

    BTW this was funny! What might be even funnier is that I bet she did a response.

  5. daddychef
    January 21, 2008 | 7:42 pm

    Wanted you naive woman who does not know anything about bdsm. I am willing to let my vast fortune be hers. Use of the jet and home in italy. I am willing to retire from my international modeling career to be her servant. Apply to M Mouse 1234 fantasyland way Magic Moutain North Pole

    PS please be real

  6. downtownladbug
    January 21, 2008 | 8:13 pm

    yeah, i wouldn’t get too upset about this. she is not dominant. just a gold-digger with no clue.

  7. axe
    January 21, 2008 | 10:12 pm

    You’re right of course. At least she’s honest about what she’s looking for. Still, I wonder if there’s a desperate guy out there that’s willing to take her up on her offer because he can’t find anything else.

  8. puresecrets
    January 22, 2008 | 9:39 am

    i don’t understand why people feel the need to catagorize relationships. Each couple is unique and should only be concerned with what fits their needs. I myself don’t think Dom/sub needs to be connected with BDSM. It is a part of my lifestyle but I know of a few submissive personalities coupled with Dominate partners living a vanilla lifestyle and are very happy. To each his own people

  9. Aarkey
    January 29, 2008 | 5:10 pm

    I guess you never saw the “Craig’s list meets Wall Street” that made the rounds last year. http://howardlindzon.com/?p=2725

    Anytime I see gold digging, all I have to do is think of this exchange and I’ll smile.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.unspeakableaxe.com/2008/01/20/upsetting-craigslist-post-of-the-week/trackback/